This rule would fail when the constituent part of closed-form compound words are capitalised.

Fail

function unSubscribe() {}
let passWord;
let isInViewPort;

Pass

function unsubscribe() {}
let password;
let isInViewport;

Problem statement

Compound words are formed by joining together two or more other words. Closed-form compound words do that without a hyphen/space. They are words in their own right, and should be treated as such when applying programming casing conventions.

Time and again I see these words incorrectly treated as separate words for the purpose of camelCase. This causes the following problems:

• confusion and bugs when code using one form interacts with code using the other form
• spread of incorrect form throughout codebase in the name of consistency
• personal aggrevation

Examples

Standalone: callBack, dataBase, fileName, lookUp, offLine, onLine, overRide, passWord, payLoad, placeHolder, preView, setUp, unSubscribe, userName, viewPort, weekEnd

Combined: isInViewPort, showPreView, isOnLine

Some of these are arguably OK, others are definitely not.

Existing solutions

The ESLint rule id-blacklist can be configured to disallow a list of identifiers. It has some limitations (by design) which make it less than ideal for this problem:

1. Only works on complete names, i.e. would not detect isInViewPort
2. ESLint rule options configured in a shareable config cannot be extended/merged by an extending config; the entire options object must be copied into the extending config.