for the following code:
const x = {
1: 1,
a: 2,
};
const y = x['a']; // can also be written as x.a
const z = x[1];
the prefer-at
rule will suggest and autofix const z = x[1];
to const z = x.at(1);
- this is an object and therefore does not have the .at
property available, while the x['a']
accessor remains unchanged.
While in TypeScript and Javascript, object property keys are supposed to always be strings, we cannot always assume that they are.
I believe that the rule should check whether you are accessing on an object and therefore not suggest the fix
Pay now to fund the work behind this issue.
Get updates on progress being made.
Maintainer is rewarded once the issue is completed.
You're funding impactful open source efforts
You want to contribute to this effort
You want to get funding like this too