Enhancement: Support dependencies in Guards
Originally discussed n #1116 (comment)
If we add guards into the dependency graph, it would allow them to receive the same kwargs as dependencies as well, making them more convenient to use since they can opt to receive things such as query params, cookies and headers as needed, without having to go through the ASGIConnection.
Making the same data available in route handlers, dependencies and guards also makes for a better DX imo, since it's a bit more intuitive.
litestar-org / litestar
Production-ready, Light, Flexible and Extensible ASGI API framework | Effortlessly Build Performant APIs
5.5k
How does funding with Polar work?
1
Pay now to fund the work behind this issue.
2
Get updates on progress being made.
3
Maintainer is rewarded once the issue is completed.
FAQ
Backer
You're funding impactful open source efforts
Contributor
You want to contribute to this effort
Maintainer
You want to get funding like this too