readFIle
--> readFileSync
... and any others
This could be seen as quite a file-heavy module, so i think speed can be a concern. By nature, async operations are slightly slower to process than sync operations (as in awaiting those). Alongside this, I have seen time and time again (and ive just tested this again), that Deno's sync methods are faster than the async variant (about 400% faster when comparing readFile and readFileSync)
So thats why i think it would be a good idea to do this, and there's no loss - maybe even some methods may not even need an await
Pay now to fund the work behind this issue.
Get updates on progress being made.
Maintainer is rewarded once the issue is completed.
You're funding impactful open source efforts
You want to contribute to this effort
You want to get funding like this too