Related to an issue that was posted in the original kysely repo.
With a field that looks something like:
+------------+-----------------+------+-----+-------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+------------+-----------------+------+-----+-------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
| id | bigint unsigned | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment |
The generated output is
id: Generated<number>;
I'd expect Generated<bigint> in this scenario to match typings in kysely, which wrap id with bigint.
RobinBlomberg / kysely-codegen
Generate Kysely type definitions from your database.
787
How does funding with Polar work?
1
Pay now to fund the work behind this issue.
2
Get updates on progress being made.
3
Maintainer is rewarded once the issue is completed.
FAQ
Backer
You're funding impactful open source efforts
Contributor
You want to contribute to this effort
Maintainer
You want to get funding like this too